@Shoq vs. @Popularch on #BradleyManning

On February 13, the long-simmering tension between David House (@Popularch) and @Shoq exploded. Compiled below is their heated debate about Bradley Manning's treatment and House's motives for drawing attention to it. Feel free to edit by clicking "Options" below. For a related argument from the same day, see: http://chirpstory.com/li/713
prison HOUSE manning torture bradley popularch David shoq
1148 View 0 comments
Add to Favorite
0
@popularch
Amtrak stations have become an Orwellian caricature. TSA go home.
Shoq Value @Shoq
Left your ID at home this time? RT @popularch: Amtrak stations have become an Orwellian caricature. TSA go home.
Shoq Value @Shoq
.@popularch First you render"torture" a completely meaningless word, and now you go after "Orwellian," too? #p2
mr. joseph teeny @smrtmnky
@Shoq i have no idea what @popularch is ranting about. taking the train here in Ca is really easy. i actually think it is too lax
Shoq Value @Shoq
.@smrtmnky We're produced a generation of people in love w/ discount store philosophy. Ideas are easy, cheap, and worthless. #p2
@popularch
.@Shoq Defending the US treatment of Bradley Manning is unconscionable.
Shoq Value @Shoq
.@popularch a) Spit out the straw, scarecrow. I've never said a word about his treatment. You, on the other hand, EXPLOIT him. Routinely
Shoq Value @Shoq
.@popularch b) What did your phony little straw have to do with my comment on your preposterous remark about Amtrak?
Shoq Value @Shoq
.@popularch Does this mean you will now answer questions about how you knew Adrian Lamo and Bradley Manning?
Shoq Value @Shoq
.@popularch You have been asked again and again.. but you continue your secrecy? How come?
@popularch
.@shoq It is easy to lob ad-hominem attacks from behind a veil of anonymity; it is much more difficult to take action for what is right.
@popularch
.@shoq Your sole purpose seems to be the destruction of those that stand in support for Manning; I will not let you embroil my friends.
Shoq Value @Shoq
.@popularch In other words, you have no intention of telling the truth, simply because no one asked. Right?
Shoq Value @Shoq
.@popularch You make a big fuss for people who buy your act. Few that know you seem to. Why is that?
Shoq Value @Shoq
.@popularch "My sole purpose," unlike yours, is the truth. I fully disclose my motives on my blog. You disclose nothing but smoke.
Shoq Value @Shoq
.@popularch Why don't you agree to an interview with one reporter who isn't locked into your little ring of con men. Just one?
@popularch
.@shoq I have no intention of responding to your ad-hominem attacks on my character and the character of those that support Bradley Manning.
Shoq Value @Shoq
.@popularch I will even give you the questions in advance. I mean, you're a big believer in transparency, right? Wouldn't you welcome this?
Shoq Value @Shoq
.@popularch More smoke, David? Which "ad hominem" attacks were they, exactly? Be specific.
Shoq Value @Shoq
.@popularch Come on, David. You talk a good game with journalists that nod at you. Why not answer REAL questions?
Shoq Value @Shoq
.@popularch You're starting to look like you're afraid of some simple questions. Why would that affect Bradley Manning?
Shoq Value @Shoq
.@popularch Could it be that you've been a lot less candid about how you knew Lamo and Manning from the outset?
@popularch
@shoq Present them: question@popularch.com
Shoq Value @Shoq
.@popularch I am on record as supporting @wikileaks, and having no opinion about Manning's "treatment." You are.
Nadim Kobeissi @kaepora
.@shoq It's one thing to discover more about the @popularch /Manning story, but to say that the US is not torturing Manning is just naive
Load Remaining (207)
Login and hide ads.