NewsConnoisseur & dvnix have a chat

NewsConnoisseur & dvnix have a chat
0
find . -type f -exec sed -i -e ‘s/and/\&/gi’ {} \; @mpersandy

@owillis I swear, even when he's attempting to do a proscribed takedown, he STILL manages to trip over his Velcro sneakers.

12/01/2012 01:32:11 WIB
Joe @NewsConnoisseur

@dvnix What did I trip up on? Was I wrong about something? If so, let me know what it was.

12/01/2012 02:05:40 WIB
Joe @NewsConnoisseur

@dvnix Interesting. What's funny about me?

12/01/2012 02:06:32 WIB
find . -type f -exec sed -i -e ‘s/and/\&/gi’ {} \; @mpersandy

@NewsConnoisseur Just the whole thing. Honest criticism [aside from disagreeing with your points]: you're just spewing ad hominem

12/01/2012 02:07:17 WIB
Joe @NewsConnoisseur

@dvnix Give me an example of an ad hominem argument that I used.

12/01/2012 02:08:22 WIB
Joe @NewsConnoisseur

@dvnix Some would say that calling me a "bin Laden apologist", as you have, and as Oliver did, is ad hominem. Do you agree?

12/01/2012 02:09:04 WIB
Joe @NewsConnoisseur

@dvnix I don't see anywhere where I made an ad hominem argument. The "argument" part of "ad hominem argument" is important.

12/01/2012 02:13:14 WIB
Joe @NewsConnoisseur

@dvnix See, that's a classic ad hominem argument. Instead of rebutting my argument, you attack me for being an "apologist for bin Laden"

12/01/2012 02:13:44 WIB
Joe @NewsConnoisseur

@dvnix I never made an ad hominem argument. Only you and Oliver did that to me.

12/01/2012 02:14:06 WIB
find . -type f -exec sed -i -e ‘s/and/\&/gi’ {} \; @mpersandy

@NewsConnoisseur I can tell that your reputation preceded you well. I think it's probably wise for my workload to cut this short. TTFN

12/01/2012 02:20:29 WIB
Joe @NewsConnoisseur

@dvnix I have no idea what that's supposed to mean. What have you heard about my reputation?

12/01/2012 02:26:07 WIB
Joe @NewsConnoisseur

@dvnix 1 last Q: when Willis sed 2 me: "wtf is wrong with you", "you sound sick", & called me an apologist 4 al qaeda, was that ad hominem?

12/01/2012 02:28:27 WIB
Joe @NewsConnoisseur

@dvnix so aparently ur standards 4 what constitutes "ad hominem" vary depending on who ur applying them 2. Very pragmatic approach :)

12/01/2012 02:31:48 WIB
Joe @NewsConnoisseur

@dvnix What context shows that I am an al Qaeda apologist?

12/01/2012 02:35:44 WIB
find . -type f -exec sed -i -e ‘s/and/\&/gi’ {} \; @mpersandy

RT @NewsConnoisseur: What context shows that I am an al Qaeda apologist? // if you can't see that, then we're obviously done here.

12/01/2012 02:48:25 WIB
Joe @NewsConnoisseur

@dvnix Shorter you: "I called u an al Qaeda apologist, but have no evidence, so we're done here."

12/01/2012 02:50:18 WIB
Load Remaining (28)

Comment

Midsomer Murder Hornet @mpersandy 12/01/2012 10:36:01 WIB
Oh, you got me good, Joe. I am every so embarrassed, I shall never ever tweet politics with a Tweeter of your caliber again. *falls over defeated, half-chuckling*
0
Joe @NewsConnoisseur 12/01/2012 11:21:52 WIB
I hope you don't really feel that way, and I hope we chat again about other things. You were wrong to call me an al Qaeda apologist, and so was Oliver. In a perfect world, you'd apologize, but I'm not looking for that. I know that's just not what happen
0
Midsomer Murder Hornet @mpersandy 15/01/2012 03:50:16 WIB
And in a perfect world, you'd see how the people you're listening are skewing things as Boolean choices when they're clearly not. And how they're being entirely and dangerously divisive.
0