Login and hide ads.
dadefjam @dadefjam 14/07/2011 03:41:33 WIB
Historical document. @kpoulsen: Wired.com publishes the full chat logs between @6 and @bmanningfm. http://j.mp/oGpdbk #wikileaks
Kevin Poulsen @kpoulsen 14/07/2011 04:01:27 WIB
The Manning logs have named anchors for direct links. view source for line number. eg, #
James Ball @jamesrbuk 14/07/2011 04:02:22 WIB
@kpoulsen Post opens with "now is the time to publish". Why now? Why not sooner? Why not later?
Kevin Poulsen @kpoulsen 14/07/2011 04:05:40 WIB
@jamesrbuk The view was the recent NYMag piece substantially mooted our privacy concerns, as described in the post.
James Ball @jamesrbuk 14/07/2011 04:06:45 WIB
@kpoulsen Hmm. I suspect whether publishing was the right or wrong decision is substantially unchanged now versus then.
James Ball @jamesrbuk 14/07/2011 04:07:00 WIB
@kpoulsen But obviously it's a matter for Wired's editorial judgement and no-one else's.
James Ball @jamesrbuk 14/07/2011 04:07:45 WIB
@kpoulsen 1 more query: I'm not sure about your underlining. Think some underlined pars are new, and some non-underlined aren't. Am I right?
Kevin Poulsen @kpoulsen 14/07/2011 04:11:31 WIB
@jamesrbuk Barring some oversight, all the underlined parts are old, all non-underlined parts new (though some had appeared on bboing)
Tom Watson @tomwatson 14/07/2011 04:12:49 WIB
@jamesrbuk @kpoulsen They obviously prove the accusation Wired subjectively redacted logs to aid prosecution, hurt Wikileaks </snark>
matt blaze @mattblaze 14/07/2011 04:20:11 WIB
@kpoulsen Unfortunately, none of that makes it any less sad to read.
Tom Watson @tomwatson 14/07/2011 04:28:35 WIB
@ggreenwald @jamesrbuk You did say at the time what Wired and @kpoulsen seemed "eager, for whatever reasons, to hide the truth." Still fair?
Daniel Hanley 🌹 @calamardh 14/07/2011 04:30:15 WIB
@kpoulsen -- @ggreenwald was right. There is plenty of relevant information here that you should have released sooner.
Kevin Poulsen @kpoulsen 14/07/2011 04:31:51 WIB
@tomwatson @ggreenwald @jamesrbuk We've done more than anyone to reveal the truth in this story, even before today.
James Ball @jamesrbuk 14/07/2011 04:32:45 WIB
@kpoulsen @tomwatson Er, I think Spiegel, Guardian, @ggreenwald @GregMitch, et al, deserve some credit too.
Bailey Carlson @chagrinish 14/07/2011 04:41:10 WIB
.@auerfeld @kpoulsen asked @6 to call him yesterday, I had hoped it was for the Asperger's correction - perhaps it was for this...
Kevin Poulsen @kpoulsen 14/07/2011 04:41:48 WIB
@jamesrbuk Of course: Guardian in particular owns the WikiLeaks story.
James Ball @jamesrbuk 14/07/2011 04:42:53 WIB
@kpoulsen Chatlogs still quite the scoop, if a rather grim one. Imagine you're mainly getting flak for not publishing sooner?
Naomi Colvin @auerfeld 14/07/2011 04:44:36 WIB
.@bailey_carlson I think it's safe to assume it was about this. Wonder if we'll see either of them online in the near future @kpoulsen @6
@twothreemany23 14/07/2011 04:45:56 WIB
@jamesrbuk @ggreenwald I'm just reading, sick doesn't begin to describe it. @kpoulsen the decision to publish now, why?
Cass Andra @nyxpersephone 14/07/2011 04:46:09 WIB
@bailey_carlson So maybe @kpoulsen finally comes clean and corrects/ amends his story on #Lamo. It's also been more than a year since publ.
Bailey Carlson @chagrinish 14/07/2011 04:47:30 WIB
@nyxpersephone Yes, I admit it wont accomplish much - I just can't see any reason not to especially with historical significance. @kpoulsen
Kevin Poulsen @kpoulsen 14/07/2011 04:47:59 WIB
@jamesrbuk We'll get flack for not publishing sooner, for publishing at all, and, Orwellianly, for "concealing" everything we've revealed
Load Remaining (76)

All Categories

Category related to Social Problem

Login and hide ads.